Connect with us

RussiaFeed

News

History

The most DRASTIC and BIZARRE EXPLOSION in history, June 30

On June 30, 1908, the legendary and mysterious Tunguska explosion ripped through the air above Siberia…

Anna Lutskova

Published

on

14 Views

On June 30, 1908, at 7.17 A.M., in a remote part of Russia, a fireball swept through the daytime sky. Within moments, something exploded in the atmosphere above Siberia’s Podkamennaya Tunguska River in what is now Krasnoyarsk Krai.

Tunguska event on the map

The inhabitants of Central Siberia in the 300-600 mile radius saw the explosion. According to one eyewitness,

 “the sky was split in two, and high above the forest the whole northern part of the sky appeared covered with fire… At that moment there was a bang in the sky and a mighty crash… The crash was followed by a noise like stones falling from the sky, or of guns firing.”

Eyewitnesses of the Tunguska event of 1908

Supposedly, the fireball was 50-100 m wide. It flattened about 80 million trees and demolished wildlife in the six-to-nine mile radius. The trunks and brunches of the trees however, were not burnt, just singed on the outside, seemingly by the heat wave.

The explosion (computer simulation)

After the explosion, abnormally bright nighttimes had been reported throughout Russia’s European and Western part. People were able to read at night without any additional lighting provided.

The Tunguska event remains the most powerful explosion recorded in history. It produced about 185 times more energy than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Seismic rumbles reached as far as the UK.

Tunguska event in perspective (according to John Pike)

So what caused such a destructive explosion?

Back then, it was difficult to reach this remote part of Siberia. The Tunguska region is known for its long hostile winter and a very short summer, when the ground turns into a muddy uninhabitable swamp. That’s why nobody went to the site to investigate the explosion, when it happened. Moreover, the Russian authorities had more pressing concerns, as World War I and the Russian Revolution were just a few years away.

It wasn’t until 1927 that Leonid Kulik led the first Soviet research expedition to investigate the Tunguska event.

Leonid Kulik’s Tunguska expedition

When he got there, the damage was still apparent, almost 20 years after the blast. Kulik found a large area of flattened trees, spreading out about 31 miles (50 km) wide in a weird butterfly shape.

The trees flattened 20 years after the explosion

Map depicting fallen tree pattern (arrows represent direction)

Kulik proposed that an extraterrestrial meteor had exploded in the atmosphere. However, there was no impact crater, or in fact, any meteoric remnants at all.

Today, over 100 years after the most powerful explosion in documented history, scientists are still trying to figure out what exactly happened that day in the sky…

Consequences of the Tunguska event

The reason why the Tunguska event is so dramatic is that it was an extremely rare case of what researchers call a “megaton” event – as the energy emitted was about 10-15 megatons of TNT. It is the only event of that magnitude that has happened in recent history.

Most theories suggest that an asteroid or a comet that was responsible for the blast. Russian researchers said that it was a comet, not a meteor that caused the damage. While meteorites are made up of metal and rock, comets are “dirty snowballs” of ice and dust, which can explain the absence of alien rock fragments.

Structure of a comet

As the comet warms up, jets of gas come off it as the dry ice (solid carbon dioxide) turns into gas

Some explanations were pretty crazy such as the encounter of Earth with an alien spacecraft, a mini-black-hole, a nuclear bomb, or a particle of antimatter.

According to Dr. Artemieva of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona, ideas like this are produced by human psychology:

“People who like secrets and ‘theories’ usually do not listen to scientists. A huge explosion, coupled with a lack of cosmic remnants, is ripe for these kinds of speculations.”

Tunguska event alien spacecraft theory

At the turn of the 21st century, a new theory was proposed blaming the explosion on the unfortunate experiment by Nikola Tesla. It suggested that the scientist conducted a wireless energy transmission “through the air” to illuminate the way to the North Pole for the American Arctic explorer Robert Pirie. The uninhabited region between Alaska and the North Pole was a perfect practice ground for executing wireless energy transmission, but, due to the absence of proper tools, the measurements were incorrect, causing the explosion.

Long Island lay in a direct path between Peary’s destination and the North Pole

So… Tesla kept his experiment secret as he realized how grossly he missed the target and how much damage he had done. Scary hidden truth or another crazy theory?

In 2013, the Russian research team put a stop to the speculations. Led by Victor Kvasnytsya of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the researchers analyzed microscopic samples of rocks collected from the explosion site in 1978.

Kvasnytsya came to the following conclusion:

“Our study of samples from Tunguska, as well as research of many other authors reveals meteorite origin of Tunguska event. We believe that nothing paranormal happened at Tunguska.”

Mineral sample from the Tunguska meteorite of 1908

However, it is still not a definitive conclusion. Meteor showers occur often, and many small ones might therefore sprinkle their remnants onto Earth unnoticed. Samples with meteoric origin could presumably come from one of these. It is also doubtful that the peat collected dates from 1908.

We may never find out whether the Tunguska event was caused by a meteor or comet. And unfortunately, we still cannot fully protect ourselves from similar events.

Chelyabinsk-sized meteors are believed to occur roughly every 1000 years, while Tunguska style impacts as often as once every 100-200 years. If another explosion like the Tunguska event took place above a populated city, it would kill thousands if not millions…

Meteor Crater, Arizona

The good news is that probability of that happening is extremely small, especially given the huge surface area of Earth that is covered in water.

Gareth Collins of Imperial College London, UK, states:

“When a Tunguska-type event happens again, the overwhelming probability is that it will happen nowhere near human population.”

Distribution of land and water over the Earth’s surface

And don’t forget…

Thousands of astronomers constantly peer into the skies with their telescopes to look for signs that rocks with the potential to cause a similar event are heading our way, and to assess the risk that they pose just so that we can sleep at night…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
7 Comments

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
John R. NolanTim WebbVera GottliebKyleRichard Moore Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Richard Moore
Guest

An explanation for this event has been found by the folks at thunderbolts.info. First of all, there is no difference between a meteor, comet, or asteroid, except for their orbit and size. Dirty snowballs is a false assumption. The incoming object blew apart as part of an electrical discharge event.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

My own theory, which is shared by millions around the world, including top journalists at the NYT and WP, as well as many high-ranking but anonymous individuals at the FBI, CIA, and NSA, is that this event was caused by Vladimir Putin, who, as part of his ability to travel through time and space with a mere twitch of those enigmatic eyebrows of his, was making a first attempt to influence the outcome of the US Presidential Election of 2016 by exploding an antimatter bomb above NYC, the home of the DNC. However, the best-laid plans of mice and men… Read more »

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

That is one of the best explanations of such an event. It reminds one of the theory of evolution, where something appeared out of nothing, with what some refer to as the BIG BANG.
Maybe it was a trial of the BIG BANG before Western scientists got their messy little hands on it?

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Again, Putin seems to have his fingerprints all over this.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

It amazes me how Mr. Putin can be blamed for the American election facade, the collapse of the world economy, global warming, or freezing, depending whether you are in Alaska or the Sahara desert, whilst being responsible for the Kazarian plans for the one world government. I believe he is a very capable, efficient bloke, but surely, even he could not put this together all by himself. One noticed alternate finger prints on the scene of this crime, and Mr. Putin was out of the country at the time of the 1st., 2nd. and coming 3rd. world war. Everyone wants… Read more »

Kyle
Guest
Kyle

There was another weird explosion sort of similar to this: The Wanggongchang Explosion in 1626 from Beijing.

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

So what good does keeping an eye on our skies??? We can be warned but any event of this size certainly can’t be avoided.

Latest

De-Dollarization Tops Agenda at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum

The Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) was held in Vladivostok on Sept.11-13. Founded in 2015, the event has become a platform for planning and launching projects to strengthen business ties in the Asia-Pacific region.

Published

on

Via Strategic Culture

This year, the EEF brought together delegations from over 60 countries to discuss the topic “The Far East: Expanding the Range of Possibilities”. A total of 100 business events involving over 6,000 participants were held during the three days.

1,357 media personnel worked to cover the forum. Last year, the number of participants was 5,000 with 1,000 media persons involved in reporting and broadcasting. The EEF-18 gathered 340 foreign and 383 Russian CEOs. Nearly 80 start-ups from across South-East Asia joined the meeting.

CLICK HERE to Support The Duran >>

This year, a total of 175 agreements worth of 2.9 trillion rubles (some $4.3 billion) were signed. For comparison, the sum was 2.5 trillion rubles (roughly $3.7 billion) in 2017.

They included the development of the Baimsky ore deposits in Chukotka, the construction of a terminal for Novatek LNG at Bechevinskaya Bay in Kamchatka and the investment of Asian countries in Russia’s agricultural projects in the Far East.

Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), Mail.Ru Group, Megafon and Chinese Alibaba inked an agreement on establishing AliExpress trade joint venture. Rosneft and Chinese CNPC signed an oil exploration agreement.

The Chinese delegation was the largest (1,096 people), followed by the Japanese (570 members). The list of guests included the president of Mongolia and prime ministers of Japan and South Korea.

It was also the first time Chinese President Xi Jinping attended the event to meet his Russian counterpart. The issue of de-dollarization topped the agenda. Russia and China reaffirmed their interest in expanding the use of national currencies in bilateral deals.

During the forum, Kirill Dmitriev, the head of RDIF, said the fund intends to use only national currencies in its transactions with China starting from 2019. It will cooperate with the China Development Bank.

This “yuanification” is making visible progress with Shanghai crude futures increasing their share of oil markets up to 14 percent or even more. China has signed agreements with Canada and Qatar on national currencies exchange.

READ MORE: Eastern Economic Forum opens new chapter in US-Russia dialogue

De-dollarization is a trend that is picking up momentum across the world. A growing number of countries are interested in replacing the dollar. Russia is leading the race to protect itself from fluctuations, storms and US-waged trade wars and sanctions.

Moscow backs non-dollar trade with Ankara amid the ongoing lira crisis. Turkey is switching from the dollar to settlements in national currencies, including its trade with China and other countries. Ditching the US dollar is the issue topping the BRICS agenda. In April, Iran transferred all international payments to the euro.

The voices calling for de-dollarization are getting louder among America’s closest European allies. In August, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called for the creation of a new payments system independent of the US.

According to him, Europe should not allow the United States to act “over our heads and at our expense.” The official wants to strengthen European autonomy by establishing independent payment channels, creating a European Monetary Fund and building up an independent SWIFT system.

Presenting his annual program, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker called on Sept. 12 for the European Union to promote the euro as a global currency to challenge the dollar.

According to him, “We must do more to allow our single currency to play its full role on the international scene.” Mr. Juncker believes “it is absurd that Europe pays for 80 percent of its energy import bill – worth 300 billion euros a year – in US dollars when only roughly 2 percent of our energy imports come from the United States.” He wants the raft of proposals made in his state of the union address to start being implemented before the European Parliament elections in May.

70% of all world trade transactions account for the dollar, while 20% are  settled in the euro, and the rest falls on the yuan and other Asian currencies. The dollar value is high to make the prices of consumer goods in the US artificially low. The demand for dollars allows refinancing the huge debt at low interest rates. The US policy of trade wars and sanctions has triggered the global process of de-dollarization.

Using punitive measures as a foreign policy tool is like shooting oneself in the foot. It prompts a backlash to undermine the dollar’s status as the world reserve currency – the basis of the US economic might. The aggressive policy undermines the US world standing to make it weaker, not stronger.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Putin and Erdogan Plan Syria-Idlib DMZ

What the Putin-Erdogan DMZ decision means is that the 50,000 Turkish troops occupying Idlib will take control over that land, and have responsibility over the largest concentration of jihadists anywhere on the planet.

Eric Zuesse

Published

on

As I recommended in a post on September 10th, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan jointly announced on September 17th, “We’ve agreed to create a demilitarized zone between the government troops and militants before October 15. The zone will be 15-20km wide,” which compares to the Korean DMZ’s 4-km width. I had had in mind the Korean experience, but obviously Putin and Erdogan are much better-informed about the situation than I am, and they have chosen a DMZ that’s four to five times wider. In any case, the consequences of such a decision will be momentous, unless U.S. President Donald Trump is so determined for there to be World War III as to stop at nothing in order to force it to happen no matter what Russia does or doesn’t do.

What the Putin-Erdogan DMZ decision means is that the 50,000 Turkish troops who now are occupying Idlib province of Syria will take control over that land, and will thus have the responsibility over the largest concentration of jihadists anywhere on the planet: Idlib. It contains the surviving Syrian Al Qaeda and ISIS fighters, including all of the ones throughout Syria who surrendered to the Syrian Army rather than be shot dead on the spot by Government forces.

For its part, the U.S. Government, backed by its allies and supported in this by high officials of the United Nations, had repeatedly threatened that if there occurs any chemical-weapons attack, or even any claimed chemical-weapons attack, inside Idlib, the U.S. and its allies will instantaneously blame the Syrian Government and bomb Syria, and will shoot down the planes of Syria and of Russia that oppose this bombing-campaign to conquer or ‘liberate’ Syria from its Government. The U.S. has announced its determination to protect what one high U.S. official — who is endorsing what Trump is doing there — “the largest Al Qaeda safe haven since 9/11.” He admits it, but he wants to protect them from being bombed by Syria and by Russia.

During recent weeks, the U.S. military has increasingly said that even if the jihadists they’ve been assisting to assemble the materials for a chemical-weapons attack fail to carry it out or to stage one, any attempt by Syrian and Russian forces to destroy the jihadists (which the U.S. side calls ‘rebels’) in Idlib will be met with overwhelming U.S.-and-allied firepower. That would spark WW III, because whichever side — Russia or U.S. — loses in the Syrian battlefield will nuclear-blitz-attack the other side so as to have the lesser damage from the nuclear war and thus (in military terms) ‘win’ WW III, because the blitz-attack will destroy many of the opposite side’s retaliatory weapons. In a nuclear war, the first side to attack will have a considerable advantage — reducing the number of weapons the other side can launch.

If, on the other hand, the DMZ-plan works, then Turkey’s forces will be responsible for vetting any of Idlib’s residents who try to leave, in order to prohibit jihadists and their supporters from leaving. Once that task (filtering out the non-dangerous inhabitants and retaining in Idlib only the jihadists and their supporters) is done, the entire world might be consulted on whether to exterminate the remaining residents or to set them free to return to the countries from which they came or to other countries. Presumably, no country would want those ‘refugees’. That would answer the question.

America’s Arab allies, the oil monarchies such as the Sauds who own Saudi Arabia and the Thanis who own Qatar, and which have funded Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, would then be put on a spot, because if they say “Exterminate them!” then their clergy who have provided the moral imprimatur upon those families’ ownership of those nations, will either be in rebellion or else will themselves become overthrown either by their own followers or else by their monarch — overthrown from below or from above.

Alternatively, after Turkey’s forces in Idlib will have allowed release from Idlib of all who will be allowed out, Syria’s and Russia’s bombers will simply go in and slaughter the then-surrounded jihadists and take upon themselves the responsibility for that, regardless of what the leaders of the U.S. and its allied governments might say.

On the night of September 17th in Syria, there were missile-attacks “from the sea” against several Syrian cities; and those attacks could have come from either Israel’s or America’s ships, or from other U.S.-allied ships. Russian Television bannered, “Russian plane disappears from radars during Israeli attack on Syria’s Latakia – MoD” and reported:

A Russian military Il-20 aircraft with 14 service members on board went off the radars during an attack by four Israeli jets on Syria’s Latakia province, the Russian Defense Ministry said.
Air traffic controllers at the Khmeimim Air Base “lost contact” with the aircraft on Wednesday evening, during the attack of Israeli F-16 fighters on Latakia, said the MOD.Russian radars also registered the launch of missiles from a French frigate in the Mediterranean on the evening of September 17. …
The attack on Latakia came just hours after Russia and Turkey negotiated a partial demilitarization of the Idlib province

If the missiles were authorized by President Trump, then WW III has already begun in its pre-nuclear stage. However, if the attacks were launched by Israel’s Netanyahu, and/or by France’s Macron, without U.S. authorization, then the U.S. President might respond to them by siding against that aggressor(s) (and also against what he used to call “Radical Islamic Terrorists”), so as to prevent a nuclear war.

Late on September 17th, Al Masdar News bannered “NATO warships move towards Syrian coast” and reported “The NATO flotilla cruising off the Syrian coast reportedly consists of a Dutch frigate, the De Ruyter, a Canadian frigate, the Ville de Quebec, and a Greek cruiser, the Elli.” Al Qaeda and ISIS have influential protectors.

Ultimately, the decision will be U.S. President Trump’s as to whether he is willing to subject the planet to WW III and to its following nuclear winter and consequent die-off of agriculture and of everyone, in order to ‘win’ a nuclear war, such as America’s aristocracy has especially championed since the year 2006. The nuclear-victory concept is called “Nuclear Primacy” — the use of nuclear weapons so as to win a nuclear war against Russia, instead of to prevent a nuclear war. That concept’s predecessor, the “Mutually Assured Destruction” or “M.A.D.” meta-strategy, predominated even in the U.S. until 2006. Trump will have to decide whether the purpose of America’s nuclear-weapons stockpiles is to prevent WW III, or is to win WW III.

In Russia, the purpose has always been to have nuclear weapons in order to prevent WW III. But America’s President will be the person who will make the ultimate decision on this. And Idlib might be the spark. Netanyahu or Macron might be wanting to drag the U.S. into war even against Russia, but the final decision will be Trump’s.

The ultimate question is: How far will the U.S. go in order to continue the U.S. dollar as being the overwhelmingly dominant global currency?

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Russian MoD: Il-20 downed by Syrian missile after attacking Israel’s F-16s used it as cover

Israeli pilots used the Russian plane as cover and set it up to be targeted by the Syrian air defense forces.

The Duran

Published

on

Russia has stated that it “reserves right to response” after claiming that Israel’s actions led to downing of Il-20 by Syrian S-200 missiles.

The Russian military accused their Israeli counterparts for causing the downing of a Russian Il-20 plane by the Syrian air defense forces, which were responding to an Israeli air raid on Latakia.

Via RT


The Russian military say the Israeli raid on Syria triggered a chain of events, which led to the shooting down of a Russian Il-20 plane by a Syrian S-200 surface-to-air missile. Moscow reserves the right to respond accordingly.

On Monday evening four Israeli F-16 fighter jets attacked targets in Syria’s Latakia after approaching from the Mediterranean, a statement by the Russian defense ministry said on Tuesday. The Israeli warplanes came at a small altitude and “created a dangerous situation for other aircraft and vessels in the region”, it said.

The military said the French Navy’s frigate “Auvergne” as well as a Russian Il-20 plane were in the area of the Israeli operation.

“The Israeli pilots used the Russian plane as cover and set it up to be targeted by the Syrian air defense forces. As a consequence, the Il-20, which has radar cross-section much larger than the F-16, was shot down by an S-200 system missile,” the statement said.

The Russian ministry stressed that the Israelis must have known that the Russian plane was present in the area, which didn’t stop them from “the provocation”. Israel also failed to warn Russia about the planned operation in advance. The warning came a minute before the attack started, which “did not leave time to move the Russian plane to a safe area,” the statement said.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending