in

BREAKING: New Russian data on MH17 crash refutes official claims

Russia is calling on the Netherlands once again to take into account information provided on the Boeing crash in Donbas.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

After three years of conspiracy, Russia is getting to the truth behind the unfortunate MH17 flight.

Earlier today, Sputnik reported that, according to the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office spokesman Alexander Kurennoy,

“On August 22, 2017, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office passed onto representatives of the Kingdom of the Netherlands’ embassy in Russia materials which were received during the fulfillment of the request of the Dutch colleagues on legal assistance in connection with the investigation of the July 17, 2014, accident on the Ukrainian territory of the Malaysia Airlines’ Boeing 777-200 aircraft, flight MH17.”

As Kurennoy said, analysis of Russian radar data passed to the Netherlands refutes the allegations of international investigators about the launch site of the missile that shot down a Malaysia Airlines Boeing flight MH17 in 2014:

“Analysis of the Russian radar’s raw and ASTERIX-format data refutes the claims of the official investigation regarding the site of the missile launch. According to the decoded radar data, the launch of the missile that shot down the Malaysian Boeing on MH17 flight could not have been carried out from the Pervomaiskoye inhabited locality, as it was stated by representatives of the Joint Investigation Team on September 28, 2016.”

He said Russia was calling on the Netherlands once again to take into account information provided on the Boeing crash in Donbas and take it into account in the investigation, adding that the Prosecutor General’s Office stressed its interest in objective investigation of the crash.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dan Tallsten
Dan Tallsten
August 26, 2017

Nobody believes your lies anymore. We know what you are. Never forget, never forgive.

Nevins Harding
Nevins Harding
Reply to  Dan Tallsten
August 26, 2017

Who is lying?

Gerry Hiles
Gerry Hiles
Reply to  Nevins Harding
August 27, 2017

All Western “authorities”, from governments to the MSM.

Dan Tallsten
Dan Tallsten
Reply to  Gerry Hiles
August 27, 2017

Oh please. Do not put words in my mouth. The answer is of course that you Russians are lying, again by spreading false information. It is pretty amusing to me how you do not understand that the game is up, there will come a day when you will have to take a bite of the shit sandwich and it will be well deserved. I have lost count of how many times you have tried to invent new stories and run like pussies from you obvious involvement in the murder of almost 300 civilians, but please be assured that your fairytales… Read more »

Dennis Morrisseau
August 26, 2017

Stories like this one–which I do believe–are much more easily understood if you show us a map.

Gerry Hiles
Gerry Hiles
Reply to  Dennis Morrisseau
August 27, 2017

OK Dennis, but why not just Google? Why not search YouTube? Why not do your own research with information that’s been public since soon after MH17 was shot down?

Gerry Hiles
Gerry Hiles
August 27, 2017

Will this data release achieve anything? Probably not. I knew about it by about September 2014. Anybody could have known, if they had wanted to know, but even a lot of doubters about the Ukrainian/Western BS went off on tangents – such as MH17 and MH340(?) being switched and already dead people – which blocked their ears and eyes. What then, or now, was the use of crash site videos, eye-witness testimony, e.g. about no rocket trails, detailed information about BUK missile systems, clear signs of cannon fire damage, the testimony of a defecting Ukrainian ground crew member, who said… Read more »

Ken Wiltshire
Ken Wiltshire
Reply to  Gerry Hiles
August 27, 2017

Gerry, your correct, it absolutely was an assassination attempt. But I don’t think the Russians want the FULL truth to come out. So I’ll leave it at that.

Vlad Pufagtinenko
Vlad Pufagtinenko
Reply to  Ken Wiltshire
August 28, 2017

Yeah good… leave it at that comrade.

Vlad Pufagtinenko
Vlad Pufagtinenko
August 28, 2017

I don’t understand why Russia is still trying to convince The Netherlands that it didn’t shoot down their plane. After all, Russians have been killing unarmed women and children for centuries.

slavko
slavko
Reply to  Vlad Pufagtinenko
August 28, 2017

After a while the repeated attempts to convince lack sincerity and shows their agenda at the root.

zorbatheturk
zorbatheturk
August 28, 2017

No mystery. RuSSian forces shot this passenger jet down. RuSSians are liars as well as murderers.

Russian armed forces may receive a “future soldier gear” by 2025

Venezuela to seek better relations with Russia, China