Connect with us

RussiaFeed

Culture

5 reasons you should NEVER marry a Russian woman

Don’t get involved with a Russian woman, if you are not ready for this.

Anna Lutskova

Published

on

47 Views

1. She will treat you like a king.

If a Russian woman truly loves her man, she kind of puts him on a pedestal. This is because Russian women value themselves: if she is the queen, she would only choose the king and treat him like the king – with respect, care, love, and support. So if you end up marrying a Russian woman, she will be telling everyone that you are the best person on the planet, the most talented, the strongest, the smartest – and she will be sincere about that.

READ MORE: Discover TRUE femininity in 17 beautiful portraits by Russian artist

2. She will never leave you. 

A Russian woman will be your partner, your best friend, your advisor, your doctor if you are sick, and she will always be by your side. For Russian women, loyalty means following their loved ones to the ends of the world and staying together through thick and thin. The best example of loyalty of Russian women is from the 19th century, when there was a riot against the Tsar, and Decembrists – the aristocrats who participated in that riot – were sentenced for a lifelong exile and hard labor in Siberia. Their wives left everything behind, followed them voluntarily to cold deserted lands, and shared the punishment of their husbands, for years living in inexplicable conditions. Surprised? Well, this is just how Russian women love: unconditionally and self-forgetfully. So if you think loyalty is unnecessary and boring, don’t marry a Russian woman.

READ MORE: 7 ways men can be more like Vladimir Putin

3. She will feed you. A LOT.

You can be sure that when you come home after a long working day, a tasty dinner is already waiting for you. ALWAYS. This is because for many Russian women, cooking is a way to show their love. Russian girls learn the art of cooking and housekeeping from their mothers and grandmothers, who teach them the age-old family recipes that are passed from generation to generation. By the way, in a Russian home, ‘a meal’ usually means three separate dishes. So if you do marry a Russian woman, make sure you always come home hungry and not late for dinner!

READ MORE: Top 5 foods Russians LOVE to eat

4. She will want babies.

Most Russian women believe that their main purpose in life is to become a wife, give birth to a child, and devote her life to her family. This is genetic: Slavic girls are psychologically ready to become mothers as soon as they get married. Traditional Russian family is incomplete without kids, and Russian women can’t understand why Western women consciously choose not to give birth to a child. Although many Russian females also have careers, when it comes to starting a family, they will sacrifice their jobs, because for them, no professional accomplishment can be more important than the moments spent with the family. So if you marry a Russian woman, there is a high chance that at some point she will tell you she wants a baby from you.

READ MORE: Putin is awarding big families to secure Russia’s future

5. She is too beautiful.

For sure you have heard about famous Slavic beauty, which has charmed so many men from different corners of the world. The dedication that Russian women have to look beautiful is just scary. They have to look amazing whether they are going to the theatre or taking the dog for a walk. So if you can’t stand other men looking admiringly at your wife, don’t marry a Russian woman.

READ MORE: RUSSIAN BEAUTY in 21 portraits by famous Russian artist

You have been warned…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
45 Comments

45
Leave a Reply

avatar
20 Comment threads
25 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
27 Comment authors
ShahnatapatioDoug BrownTim WebbJim Sprake Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Woo Fee
Guest
Woo Fee

Except for No 3 and 5-its all about me:). To be honest, I hate cooking and only do it because of No 1 (yes, my man is the best and does not deserve to survive on take aways). As well mother nature decided to take a break when it came to giving me physical attractiveness. But after all I am only quarter Russian.

Woodshedding
Guest
Woodshedding

How’s that beauty after the first (of many) children?

Helen B
Guest
Helen B

Babushka.

Doug Brown
Guest
Doug Brown

comment reflects lack of understanding as to what true love really means.

Vtran
Guest
Vtran

Absolutely ,,, And Am Married to a Russian Woman !

Woodshedding
Guest
Woodshedding

I agree. But/and the lack of understanding begins, I believe, when the article implies it’s important in the first place for a woman to be beautiful in order to be desirable. Hence my sardonicism.

ShermanRMcCoy
Guest
ShermanRMcCoy

She gets more beautiful every year. The article overdoes it a bit, but in general is accurate.

Major-Aslam Bhatti
Guest
Major-Aslam Bhatti

If this all is true,would love to have one.

Sml Cbn Raelian
Guest
Sml Cbn Raelian

Why didn’t you publish this article seventeen years ago, I was single then………….married an Asian doll, they are very similar in their family life, at that time 1967, I tried to go to your country but it was not possible ……political reasons. I am happy things have change in Russia for the better, i love you all. ps.specially your press secretary “maria” Zakharova, she is a good dancer.

mlnw
Guest
mlnw

Hear, hear for Maria Zakharova. She is is superb, and has made all of the idiot women in the Obama Administration, including the State Department Press office (Psaki, Harf, etc.) look like the unprofessional self indulgent doggies they are. It’s not that there are not competent women here – take Tulsi Gabbard , for instance- it’s that they are marginalized.

Sml Cbn Raelian
Guest
Sml Cbn Raelian

You are so right.

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

Cosign

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

Really? Why even pretend your talking about women, you are talking about politics.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Marriage/Politics………..what’s the difference?

CumExApostolatus
Guest
CumExApostolatus

This simply is a description of a traditional woman (lady) who models herself on the Western (dare I say, Christian) ideal, which means it isn’t particular to Russians.

Dan Kuhn
Guest
Dan Kuhn

I am 76 years of age. I was married three times to canadian women. I am now on my forth marriage. Some 25 years ago I came to Colombia, S. A. there I met a Colombian lady and married her. We have been together now for 21 years. Everything you say about Russian women applies to her. She is non confrontational but always gets things she wants and how she wants them. Good cook, Best mother I have ever seen. In my opinion she is perfect. She is not model worthy good looking, but believe me after 21 years of… Read more »

Im Ug
Guest
Im Ug

One should also stay away from Korean ones as they are the same as North American ones if not much worse.

Ben Kenobi
Guest
Ben Kenobi

Hear hear! Having been married to a California girl, and now to a Russian woman, you’re right about staying away from NA women!

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

So what’s wrong with a tattooed piss artist who spends most of her time talking about trivia with her friends, and the rest of the time in front of the mirror applying her war paint and then going out and screwing as many guys as she can find before aborting any resulting babies and going on antidepressants and getting fat as a result?
Isn’t this the western ideal?

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

Stereotype much?

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

I see you have never been on a girls’ night out.

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

No, you don’t see clearly at all, when high school girls are asked in Moscow, what they want to be when they grow up, the number one answer is hard currency prostitute. Your leader recently said that Russian prostitutes are best in the world. Western women are allowed to enjoy sex, just as men do, and strong men are not intimidated by this. A girls night out differs from a guy’s night out, in that men such as you, only talk about having sex, and lie, where women make things happen, without feeling the need to get paid.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

I’ll put all that into Google Translate, and see what I come up with.

Dan Kuhn
Guest
Dan Kuhn

I forgot to add one thing. Before you do actually walk down the isle with your canadian or american wife to be consider this, Just give her a house , a car, half your income and forget the marriage. that way you will save the legal fees and all that hassle.

Doug Brown
Guest
Doug Brown

This is like a strong drug. Deeply healing. In america women hate men, seeing them as oppressors, essential slavers, demented, backward, etc.
This article about Russian women is why Russia wins.
Very beautiful.

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

The cold war is over, this should not be a competition… Russian women don’t get taller because you want to knock American girls down.

Doug Brown
Guest
Doug Brown

No one is knocking American women. I am saying that, other than Amish, Mennonite, and some Catholic girls, American women: *will not cook, (they hate to cook) Microwave, or take-out, only. *will not clean house. “Who do you think I am?” they say. *do laundry very reluctantly. *hate babies. Read: abortion is cheap and easy. *detest the word “mom.” Makes the shudder with horror. These are just simple facts. Do with it what you will. Motherhood in America is now viewed as an act of overt slavery, a forcible exercise in repression, male chauvinism at it’s worst, certainly not something… Read more »

XRGRSF
Guest
XRGRSF

I’ve been married to a Brit for 38 years. Last year her illness forced me to retire from a very lucrative position, as a managing engineer, to care for her. Yesterday, while living comfortably on my retirement package, she was bitching because I wasn’t making enough money. That was a wake up call that I wish I had received 38 years ago. A man who has a good wife is blessed by God. If a man is so blessed he must then be worthy.

ArchEcoTech
Guest
ArchEcoTech

Been married for 5 years to a Russian gal, wish it had been a lot earlier in life. But I got to be honest I probably would have gotten myself in a lot of trouble when I was younger. Russian women are absolutely beautiful, down to earth, sweet, loving, and a whole lot more. Glad I’ve been blessed with the best.

RussG
Guest
RussG

Do you think a full blood transfusion from Russia women would work to transform Canadian women? Just a thought.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

wouldn’t work – it is a soul-full difference – like whole-being

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

I won’t argue with you, except to say that the Canadian could come to Los Angeles and meet Russian women here.

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
Guest
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

I married a Slav, just not Russian. She told me days ago that she doesn’t tell me she loves me because she expresses this in cooking. OK we only got married about 16 years ago and so nice to discover what she is on about. And she told me this because she is worried about dying (she is 84) and doesn’t want to leave me with the impression she didn’t love me because she never said so. But for most of the article about Russian women much applies to her. And she is fluent in the Russian language and always… Read more »

Neil
Guest
Neil

Russian women are the most naturally beautiful-looking in the world, in my opinion.

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

Beautiful women, I think so too.

Im Ug
Guest
Im Ug

They get old quickly and Russian is almost impossible to learn.

dckhead_con_artist
Guest
dckhead_con_artist

Once they get that green card they act no different than American trash . They are also materialistic . Many Russian whores in Dubai . AWALT

Manimal
Guest
Manimal

Many world whores in Dubai }:-).

Ben Kenobi
Guest
Ben Kenobi

Thank you for this lovely piece. You may want to add that she is very very protective of her children!

Charles Campbell
Guest
Charles Campbell

I was in the Navy for 21 years and one observation I made involving foreign wives, if they are hell bent to get out of their counrty then you are probably better off passing. The best I always thought were the Japanese as most guys I knew said there wives were always wanting them to back to Japan. Many did and I know of at least case where the gal just got fed up and headed back. I have always thought if you want a foreign bride , live in her country and come back to visit , your homeland.… Read more »

Jim Sprake
Guest
Jim Sprake

Russian women are pretty and can be quite skilled, the city girls are looking for a man with money, I am not mad at them, but don’t expect an old fashioned girl.

Shahna
Guest

LOL…. I know of only one…

Sometime back I saw a dash cam vid…
A Russian woman, (neat pretty little blonde thing – but don’t be fooled) tried to drive round a road block to take a short cut. A cop stopped her. So she got out her car, gave him one mountain of a mouthful, smacked him and then got back in her car and continued down her short cut. Cop stood there stunned.

You don’t mess with women like that.

Latest

Clinton-Yeltsin docs shine a light on why Deep State hates Putin (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 114.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Bill Clinton and America ruled over Russia and Boris Yeltsin during the 1990s. Yeltsin showed little love for Russia and more interest in keeping power, and pleasing the oligarchs around him.

Then came Vladimir Putin, and everything changed.

Nearly 600 pages of memos and transcripts, documenting personal exchanges and telephone conversations between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin, were made public by the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Dating from January 1993 to December 1999, the documents provide a historical account of a time when US relations with Russia were at their best, as Russia was at its weakest.

On September 8, 1999, weeks after promoting the head of the Russia’s top intelligence agency to the post of prime minister, Russian President Boris Yeltsin took a phone call from U.S. President Bill Clinton.

The new prime minister was unknown, rising to the top of the Federal Security Service only a year earlier.

Yeltsin wanted to reassure Clinton that Vladimir Putin was a “solid man.”

Yeltsin told Clinton….

“I would like to tell you about him so you will know what kind of man he is.”

“I found out he is a solid man who is kept well abreast of various subjects under his purview. At the same time, he is thorough and strong, very sociable. And he can easily have good relations and contact with people who are his partners. I am sure you will find him to be a highly qualified partner.”

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the nearly 600 pages of transcripts documenting the calls and personal conversations between then U.S. President Bill Clinton and Russian President Boris Yeltsin, released last month. A strong Clinton and a very weak Yeltsin underscore a warm and friendly relationship between the U.S. and Russia.

Then Vladimir Putin came along and decided to lift Russia out of the abyss, and things changed.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel

Here are five must-read Clinton-Yeltsin exchanges from with the 600 pages released by the Clinton Library.

Via RT

Clinton sends ‘his people’ to get Yeltsin elected

Amid unceasing allegations of nefarious Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election, the Clinton-Yeltsin exchanges reveal how the US government threw its full weight behind Boris – in Russian parliamentary elections as well as for the 1996 reelection campaign, which he approached with 1-digit ratings.

For example, a transcript from 1993 details how Clinton offered to help Yeltsin in upcoming parliamentary elections by selectively using US foreign aid to shore up support for the Russian leader’s political allies.

“What is the prevailing attitude among the regional leaders? Can we do something through our aid package to send support out to the regions?” a concerned Clinton asked.

Yeltsin liked the idea, replying that “this kind of regional support would be very useful.” Clinton then promised to have “his people” follow up on the plan.

In another exchange, Yeltsin asks his US counterpart for a bit of financial help ahead of the 1996 presidential election: “Bill, for my election campaign, I urgently need for Russia a loan of $2.5 billion,” he said. Yeltsin added that he needed the money in order to pay pensions and government wages – obligations which, if left unfulfilled, would have likely led to his political ruin. Yeltsin also asks Clinton if he could “use his influence” to increase the size of an IMF loan to assist him during his re-election campaign.

Yeltsin questions NATO expansion

The future of NATO was still an open question in the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, and conversations between Clinton and Yeltsin provide an illuminating backdrop to the current state of the curiously offensive ‘defensive alliance’ (spoiler alert: it expanded right up to Russia’s border).

In 1995, Yeltsin told Clinton that NATO expansion would lead to “humiliation” for Russia, noting that many Russians were fearful of the possibility that the alliance could encircle their country.

“It’s a new form of encirclement if the one surviving Cold War bloc expands right up to the borders of Russia. Many Russians have a sense of fear. What do you want to achieve with this if Russia is your partner? They ask. I ask it too: Why do you want to do this?” Yeltsin asked Clinton.

As the documents show, Yeltsin insisted that Russia had “no claims on other countries,” adding that it was “unacceptable” that the US was conducting naval drills near Crimea.

“It is as if we were training people in Cuba. How would you feel?” Yeltsin asked. The Russian leader then proposed a “gentleman’s agreement” that no former Soviet republics would join NATO.

Clinton refused the offer, saying: “I can’t make the specific commitment you are asking for. It would violate the whole spirit of NATO. I’ve always tried to build you up and never undermine you.”

NATO bombing of Yugoslavia turns Russia against the West

Although Clinton and Yeltsin enjoyed friendly relations, NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia tempered Moscow’s enthusiastic partnership with the West.

“Our people will certainly from now have a bad attitude with regard to America and with NATO,” the Russian president told Clinton in March 1999. “I remember how difficult it was for me to try and turn the heads of our people, the heads of the politicians towards the West, towards the United States, but I succeeded in doing that, and now to lose all that.”

Yeltsin urged Clinton to renounce the strikes, for the sake of “our relationship” and “peace in Europe.”

“It is not known who will come after us and it is not known what will be the road of future developments in strategic nuclear weapons,” Yeltsin reminded his US counterpart.

But Clinton wouldn’t cede ground.

“Milosevic is still a communist dictator and he would like to destroy the alliance that Russia has built up with the US and Europe and essentially destroy the whole movement of your region toward democracy and go back to ethnic alliances. We cannot allow him to dictate our future,” Clinton told Yeltsin.

Yeltsin asks US to ‘give Europe to Russia’

One exchange that has been making the rounds on Twitter appears to show Yeltsin requesting that Europe be “given” to Russia during a meeting in Istanbul in 1999. However, it’s not quite what it seems.

“I ask you one thing,” Yeltsin says, addressing Clinton. “Just give Europe to Russia. The US is not in Europe. Europe should be in the business of Europeans.”

However, the request is slightly less sinister than it sounds when put into context: The two leaders were discussing missile defense, and Yeltsin was arguing that Russia – not the US – would be a more suitable guarantor of Europe’s security.

“We have the power in Russia to protect all of Europe, including those with missiles,” Yeltsin told Clinton.

Clinton on Putin: ‘He’s very smart’

Perhaps one of the most interesting exchanges takes place when Yeltsin announces to Clinton his successor, Vladimir Putin.

In a conversation with Clinton from September 1999, Yeltsin describes Putin as “a solid man,” adding: “I am sure you will find him to be a highly qualified partner.”

A month later, Clinton asks Yeltsin who will win the Russian presidential election.

“Putin, of course. He will be the successor to Boris Yeltsin. He’s a democrat, and he knows the West.”

“He’s very smart,” Clinton remarks.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

De-Dollarization Tops Agenda at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum

The Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) was held in Vladivostok on Sept.11-13. Founded in 2015, the event has become a platform for planning and launching projects to strengthen business ties in the Asia-Pacific region.

Published

on

Via Strategic Culture

This year, the EEF brought together delegations from over 60 countries to discuss the topic “The Far East: Expanding the Range of Possibilities”. A total of 100 business events involving over 6,000 participants were held during the three days.

1,357 media personnel worked to cover the forum. Last year, the number of participants was 5,000 with 1,000 media persons involved in reporting and broadcasting. The EEF-18 gathered 340 foreign and 383 Russian CEOs. Nearly 80 start-ups from across South-East Asia joined the meeting.

CLICK HERE to Support The Duran >>

This year, a total of 175 agreements worth of 2.9 trillion rubles (some $4.3 billion) were signed. For comparison, the sum was 2.5 trillion rubles (roughly $3.7 billion) in 2017.

They included the development of the Baimsky ore deposits in Chukotka, the construction of a terminal for Novatek LNG at Bechevinskaya Bay in Kamchatka and the investment of Asian countries in Russia’s agricultural projects in the Far East.

Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), Mail.Ru Group, Megafon and Chinese Alibaba inked an agreement on establishing AliExpress trade joint venture. Rosneft and Chinese CNPC signed an oil exploration agreement.

The Chinese delegation was the largest (1,096 people), followed by the Japanese (570 members). The list of guests included the president of Mongolia and prime ministers of Japan and South Korea.

It was also the first time Chinese President Xi Jinping attended the event to meet his Russian counterpart. The issue of de-dollarization topped the agenda. Russia and China reaffirmed their interest in expanding the use of national currencies in bilateral deals.

During the forum, Kirill Dmitriev, the head of RDIF, said the fund intends to use only national currencies in its transactions with China starting from 2019. It will cooperate with the China Development Bank.

This “yuanification” is making visible progress with Shanghai crude futures increasing their share of oil markets up to 14 percent or even more. China has signed agreements with Canada and Qatar on national currencies exchange.

READ MORE: Eastern Economic Forum opens new chapter in US-Russia dialogue

De-dollarization is a trend that is picking up momentum across the world. A growing number of countries are interested in replacing the dollar. Russia is leading the race to protect itself from fluctuations, storms and US-waged trade wars and sanctions.

Moscow backs non-dollar trade with Ankara amid the ongoing lira crisis. Turkey is switching from the dollar to settlements in national currencies, including its trade with China and other countries. Ditching the US dollar is the issue topping the BRICS agenda. In April, Iran transferred all international payments to the euro.

The voices calling for de-dollarization are getting louder among America’s closest European allies. In August, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called for the creation of a new payments system independent of the US.

According to him, Europe should not allow the United States to act “over our heads and at our expense.” The official wants to strengthen European autonomy by establishing independent payment channels, creating a European Monetary Fund and building up an independent SWIFT system.

Presenting his annual program, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker called on Sept. 12 for the European Union to promote the euro as a global currency to challenge the dollar.

According to him, “We must do more to allow our single currency to play its full role on the international scene.” Mr. Juncker believes “it is absurd that Europe pays for 80 percent of its energy import bill – worth 300 billion euros a year – in US dollars when only roughly 2 percent of our energy imports come from the United States.” He wants the raft of proposals made in his state of the union address to start being implemented before the European Parliament elections in May.

70% of all world trade transactions account for the dollar, while 20% are  settled in the euro, and the rest falls on the yuan and other Asian currencies. The dollar value is high to make the prices of consumer goods in the US artificially low. The demand for dollars allows refinancing the huge debt at low interest rates. The US policy of trade wars and sanctions has triggered the global process of de-dollarization.

Using punitive measures as a foreign policy tool is like shooting oneself in the foot. It prompts a backlash to undermine the dollar’s status as the world reserve currency – the basis of the US economic might. The aggressive policy undermines the US world standing to make it weaker, not stronger.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Putin and Erdogan Plan Syria-Idlib DMZ

What the Putin-Erdogan DMZ decision means is that the 50,000 Turkish troops occupying Idlib will take control over that land, and have responsibility over the largest concentration of jihadists anywhere on the planet.

Eric Zuesse

Published

on

As I recommended in a post on September 10th, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan jointly announced on September 17th, “We’ve agreed to create a demilitarized zone between the government troops and militants before October 15. The zone will be 15-20km wide,” which compares to the Korean DMZ’s 4-km width. I had had in mind the Korean experience, but obviously Putin and Erdogan are much better-informed about the situation than I am, and they have chosen a DMZ that’s four to five times wider. In any case, the consequences of such a decision will be momentous, unless U.S. President Donald Trump is so determined for there to be World War III as to stop at nothing in order to force it to happen no matter what Russia does or doesn’t do.

What the Putin-Erdogan DMZ decision means is that the 50,000 Turkish troops who now are occupying Idlib province of Syria will take control over that land, and will thus have the responsibility over the largest concentration of jihadists anywhere on the planet: Idlib. It contains the surviving Syrian Al Qaeda and ISIS fighters, including all of the ones throughout Syria who surrendered to the Syrian Army rather than be shot dead on the spot by Government forces.

For its part, the U.S. Government, backed by its allies and supported in this by high officials of the United Nations, had repeatedly threatened that if there occurs any chemical-weapons attack, or even any claimed chemical-weapons attack, inside Idlib, the U.S. and its allies will instantaneously blame the Syrian Government and bomb Syria, and will shoot down the planes of Syria and of Russia that oppose this bombing-campaign to conquer or ‘liberate’ Syria from its Government. The U.S. has announced its determination to protect what one high U.S. official — who is endorsing what Trump is doing there — “the largest Al Qaeda safe haven since 9/11.” He admits it, but he wants to protect them from being bombed by Syria and by Russia.

During recent weeks, the U.S. military has increasingly said that even if the jihadists they’ve been assisting to assemble the materials for a chemical-weapons attack fail to carry it out or to stage one, any attempt by Syrian and Russian forces to destroy the jihadists (which the U.S. side calls ‘rebels’) in Idlib will be met with overwhelming U.S.-and-allied firepower. That would spark WW III, because whichever side — Russia or U.S. — loses in the Syrian battlefield will nuclear-blitz-attack the other side so as to have the lesser damage from the nuclear war and thus (in military terms) ‘win’ WW III, because the blitz-attack will destroy many of the opposite side’s retaliatory weapons. In a nuclear war, the first side to attack will have a considerable advantage — reducing the number of weapons the other side can launch.

If, on the other hand, the DMZ-plan works, then Turkey’s forces will be responsible for vetting any of Idlib’s residents who try to leave, in order to prohibit jihadists and their supporters from leaving. Once that task (filtering out the non-dangerous inhabitants and retaining in Idlib only the jihadists and their supporters) is done, the entire world might be consulted on whether to exterminate the remaining residents or to set them free to return to the countries from which they came or to other countries. Presumably, no country would want those ‘refugees’. That would answer the question.

America’s Arab allies, the oil monarchies such as the Sauds who own Saudi Arabia and the Thanis who own Qatar, and which have funded Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, would then be put on a spot, because if they say “Exterminate them!” then their clergy who have provided the moral imprimatur upon those families’ ownership of those nations, will either be in rebellion or else will themselves become overthrown either by their own followers or else by their monarch — overthrown from below or from above.

Alternatively, after Turkey’s forces in Idlib will have allowed release from Idlib of all who will be allowed out, Syria’s and Russia’s bombers will simply go in and slaughter the then-surrounded jihadists and take upon themselves the responsibility for that, regardless of what the leaders of the U.S. and its allied governments might say.

On the night of September 17th in Syria, there were missile-attacks “from the sea” against several Syrian cities; and those attacks could have come from either Israel’s or America’s ships, or from other U.S.-allied ships. Russian Television bannered, “Russian plane disappears from radars during Israeli attack on Syria’s Latakia – MoD” and reported:

A Russian military Il-20 aircraft with 14 service members on board went off the radars during an attack by four Israeli jets on Syria’s Latakia province, the Russian Defense Ministry said.
Air traffic controllers at the Khmeimim Air Base “lost contact” with the aircraft on Wednesday evening, during the attack of Israeli F-16 fighters on Latakia, said the MOD.Russian radars also registered the launch of missiles from a French frigate in the Mediterranean on the evening of September 17. …
The attack on Latakia came just hours after Russia and Turkey negotiated a partial demilitarization of the Idlib province

If the missiles were authorized by President Trump, then WW III has already begun in its pre-nuclear stage. However, if the attacks were launched by Israel’s Netanyahu, and/or by France’s Macron, without U.S. authorization, then the U.S. President might respond to them by siding against that aggressor(s) (and also against what he used to call “Radical Islamic Terrorists”), so as to prevent a nuclear war.

Late on September 17th, Al Masdar News bannered “NATO warships move towards Syrian coast” and reported “The NATO flotilla cruising off the Syrian coast reportedly consists of a Dutch frigate, the De Ruyter, a Canadian frigate, the Ville de Quebec, and a Greek cruiser, the Elli.” Al Qaeda and ISIS have influential protectors.

Ultimately, the decision will be U.S. President Trump’s as to whether he is willing to subject the planet to WW III and to its following nuclear winter and consequent die-off of agriculture and of everyone, in order to ‘win’ a nuclear war, such as America’s aristocracy has especially championed since the year 2006. The nuclear-victory concept is called “Nuclear Primacy” — the use of nuclear weapons so as to win a nuclear war against Russia, instead of to prevent a nuclear war. That concept’s predecessor, the “Mutually Assured Destruction” or “M.A.D.” meta-strategy, predominated even in the U.S. until 2006. Trump will have to decide whether the purpose of America’s nuclear-weapons stockpiles is to prevent WW III, or is to win WW III.

In Russia, the purpose has always been to have nuclear weapons in order to prevent WW III. But America’s President will be the person who will make the ultimate decision on this. And Idlib might be the spark. Netanyahu or Macron might be wanting to drag the U.S. into war even against Russia, but the final decision will be Trump’s.

The ultimate question is: How far will the U.S. go in order to continue the U.S. dollar as being the overwhelmingly dominant global currency?

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending